I worked for an insurance company in my twenties and a 459 error was a client address that could not be confirmed. I needed to see the client and obtain proof for their address. A few years later I worked for a bread company and a 459 was a product line; a type of bread. Again in my next career as a police officer in California, a 459 was a burglary. In all these occupations I did a lot of driving and needed a license to drive and had to obey the traffic laws of the State. The larger system, the State, had structure, defined terms and values that were universal and held precedence to all three of the subsystems. A lot of the structure, terms and values of these smaller systems were different but all were required to be congruent with State Law.
Not uncommon to find a smaller organization nested within a large system and the smaller component sheathed in more rules, more complexity and different semantics than the larger. In my example above I used numbers but those are symbols that could just as well have been words. For example, with an economist, the word “utility” means something different than the power company you get monthly bills from.
The human packages are designs, each individual somewhat unique, based on a model of development (potential) in a universe based on useful in compliance to evolving system changes. Evolution establishes balance by conservation (extinction) as a preference to complexity. Not unusual to find priority language in human subsystems but today it is fashionable to utilize sub-set language at higher human levels. Sort of a badge of membership or symbol of prestige. However these content specific terms often fail to transfer value in the larger system and humans today are established in many more subsystems than apparent in the near past.
Relate this to a person in a family, in a sub-culture, nested in a culture within a state, all within a country on this planet and in this universe. A person steeped in a family structure might be forgetful of the law of their culture but they are held responsible (defined in response to the culture). Truth is, a lot of the parameters in the subsystems reflect basic structure ingrained in the larger package. Most folks know what is required, they just have no idea which level requires compliance. Who can we trust? What is the promise in an advertisement? Is a warranty ever of value? When does “no” mean no? Lots of evidence to indicate that we are not doing a great job in communicating base value.
I propose a retreat to master another avenue in processing human value data other than audio processing; specifically internal filtered audio processing. The present level of complexity and abstraction has mutated the threats of communication such that we now impersonalize (remove the human) by texting folks within earshot. Time in reflection works to re-establish presence and refine techniques to launch an improved or at least a more congruent update to our human systems of communication.